Services
Your practice holds years of patient histories, results and outcomes. Somewhere in them, you suspect, is something more useful than an archive: a better way to run your practice, maybe a product other practices would pay for. The software you are sold today was written by people who have never sat in a consulting room. Yours would not be.
I help you find out whether the product you suspect exists actually does. We look at what your records could support, what your practice needs from day to day, and what other practices would recognise as worth paying for.
Patient information is handled with the care it demands: it stays under your control, it is used only with proper consent, and everything follows the laws that govern health records in your country and any country the work touches.
That is not a burden the work carries reluctantly; it is part of the assessment itself. What the law permits, what your patients have actually consented to, and what your professional body expects are examined alongside the technical questions — because a product your practice could not lawfully use is not feasible, however clever the software.
Whatever we build serves your own consulting rooms before anyone else's. It has to earn its keep where you can watch it working.
If it proves itself, the same product can be offered to other practices, and what began as an internal tool becomes a business of its own. That second step stays optional. You decide once you have watched the thing work.
The useful version of artificial intelligence in a practice is not a robot doctor. It is software that has learned from your own records and gives your people time back: notes that write themselves up, results that are flagged before anyone has to hunt for them, patterns across years of outcomes that no one person could hold in their head. The judgement stays with the doctor; the paperwork stops eating the day.
Health information is also where I hold myself to the strictest standard, and not in theory. I spent a decade building systems for banks and lenders, where the rules are unforgiving and software cannot fail quietly, and I have built disease-modelling tools for Médecins Sans Frontières that ran in the field, far from any server room. That is the engineering culture your patient records deserve.
Sometimes. Years of histories, results and outcomes can support tools your practice needs and other practices would pay for. Whether yours can is what the feasibility assessment answers, before a builder's budget gets spent finding out the hard way.
It can be, or the work does not proceed. Records stay under your control, are used only with proper consent, and every step respects the laws that govern health information in your country and any country the work touches.
From €9,500, as a fixed fee. Three to four weeks, ending in a written verdict: build it, change it, or leave it.
That is a choice you make after the product has proved itself in your own consulting rooms — not a promise made before. If it earns its keep, offering it to other practices turns an internal tool into a business of its own.
Picture the ordinary friction of a consulting day. Letters and referrals that each take fifteen minutes to write up. Results that arrive overnight and wait for someone to notice them. The patient who has been seen by three colleagues over five years, whose story has to be reassembled from notes each time. None of this is dramatic, and all of it is exactly where software that has learned from your own records earns its keep — drafting the letter for the doctor to approve, surfacing the result that needs eyes today, holding the whole history in one place.
Start there, and something larger often follows. The tool that organises your practice's records has, by construction, learned the shape of every practice like yours — which is why the second step, offering it to other practices, is sometimes worth taking. But it earns that chance in your own consulting rooms first.
The feasibility assessment comes first: a fixed piece of work, from €9,500, that tells you whether the idea deserves a builder's budget before you commit one.
If the verdict is build, I do the building too, to the standards patient information demands.
If a conversation suits you better, start with that.
Start a conversation